Performance Comparison
Compared with other L2 solutions, Gate Layer has a lower gas fee and a higher block gas limit, which means the gas fee will be more stable when the traffic on Layer 2 increases.
| Gate Layer | Base | BSC | X Layer | Solana | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gas Token | GT | ETH | BNB | OKB | SOL |
| VM | EVM | EVM | EVM | EVM | SVM |
| Rollup Method | op rollup (op stack) | op rollup (op stack) | L1 | zk rollup (polygon CDK) | L1 |
| Block Gas Limit | 120 M | 150 M | 75 M | - | 60 M Compute Units |
| Block Time | 1s | 2s | 0.75s | 0.4s | 0.4s |
| Max TPS | 5,713 | 3,571 | 4,600 | 5,000 | 107,540 |
| Million Transfer Cost ($) | 30 | 773 | 2090 | 420 | 1200 |
| Transfer Cost Comparison (times higher) | 1 | 25 | 69 | 14 | 40 |
Note: The above are experimental data based on the network environment and transaction data at the time, with transfer fees calculated at 21,000 gas. Results may vary depending on environment and price differences.
Performance Comparison Highlights
- Throughput Advantage: Gate Layer's peak TPS of 5,713 surpasses most competitors (Base 3,571, X Layer 5,000).
- Block Speed: 1-second block time leads most competitors, significantly outperforming Base's 2-second blocks.
- Gas Capacity: 120M block gas limit leads most competitors, ensuring stable performance under high load.
- Cost Efficiency: Million transfer cost of only $30 demonstrates significant cost advantages among L2 solutions.